writing by the rules

Golly, writers have to pay attention to a lot of rules these days.

Not just submission guidelines, either. Like, writing rules.

On one hand, you’ve got industry insiders telling you which paranormal creatures are coming in, and which ones are going out. (I don’t write paranormal, but I think maybe vampires are going out and angels are coming in and zombies are going strong? If I’m wrong, check back in ten minutes and maybe I’ll be right.) You’ve got word count guidelines. You’ve got agents who love prologues and agents who hate prologues. Your novel has got to ask the Seven Vital Questions. You can’t have a Happy Moment until Four of the Seven Vital Questions have been Answered (and this can’t happen until after the tenth chapter). Your novel must not begin with the protagonist waking up from a dream, and certainly cannot end that way. The novel’s Third Vital Question can neither be asked nor answered on Shrove Tuesday.

I love this one: the market can’t handle X, Y, or Z. But don’t write for the market.

All the same people who are giving us these Seedlings of Wisdom are also telling us this: just write. Everything else is procrastination. Just Do It.

Here’s the thing. All these rules need a spreadsheet and I’m no good at Excel (which is too bad, because the temp agencies I’ll be applying to with tears on my CV after my PhD is done really want Excel).

Anne Lamott says of her writing students: ‘The problem that comes up over and over again is that these people really want to be published. They kind of want to write, but they really want to be published.’

It’s a stout thing to say: I write for the joy. I write to create. I write because I have to. All these things are true of me. But hell yeah, I want to be published too. Even in this market, even for the proverbial dozen doughnuts and a stick in the eye. I want it.

And I have to say this, even though it’s gonna make me sound like one of the bad guys: it’s hard to keep your joy. It’s really hard. And it’s not just the market. I think the cacophony of available information and advice can hurt us if we’re not careful. There are so many opinions, so many tips, so many Don’t Go Theres that writers are afraid to move. They’re being told to Just Do It but they no longer know how.

No one ever apologises for this, nor should they. The bar is constantly moving for writers, and it’s the writer’s job to know where the bar is and clear it. Because an unknown writer is nothing, no one: the rules are never going to change to make the unknown writer happy. In fact, a few less unknown writers overall would probably do the world some good. They could move on from writing dreams and do something useful. Patricia Finney says if you get the urge to write, don’t. Fight it every way you can. Only if you lose every one of those fights should you give in to writing. If at all possible, make your mark on the world in some other way.

I say I’ve lost all the fights. I can’t do Excel, after all.

But I submit this: looking for tips and tricks and What’s Hot and What You Must Never Do In A Novel is just like research, and just like reading over what you’ve just written and worrying one sentence for weeks on end. It’s procrastinating. We are being besieged with Rules and while it’s good that they’re there – it’s good that we have access to so much information – there’s an extent to which we have to treat the Rules like pop-up ads and block them out. Otherwise nothing gets done. You know John Irving still writes longhand? There’s something in that.

Writing is terribly, terribly solitary. If you want to write you have to be willing to stand in a corner and just watch without interacting with anyone. The words on the page are yours; whether they ever see the light of day is your call. And the sad sorry fucking truth is that you can’t write for the market: the market is fickle; the market changes. Publishing is slow. You can’t write What’s Hot Now because by the time it’s on shelves, it won’t be Hot anymore. But if you really like What’s Hot Now, write it, because it’ll come back. These things always do.

It’s not for us to be arbiters of the Rules, nor to complain about them, nor to necessarily pay any attention to them until that first draft is in the can. The Rules won’t help you with your first draft. They help you to polish; they help you to present. But if you’re in the Creamy Middle of your first draft, don’t read a tweet or a blog post and panic and go back and change everything. Keep your horse blinders on and keep going.

Once again, most of you probably don’t need to hear this. But I needed to write it down, for myself.

Till next time, if God wills it, &c &c.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Related posts:

  1. the magic in writing
  2. on universities, tenure, and writing
  3. links for writing and reading
  4. in defence of writers
  5. the matter of detail


4 Responses to “writing by the rules”

  • sunna Says:

    Well said, Sarah. I try, sort of, to aim generally for popular when I go shuffling through my list of oooh-wouldn’t-this-be-a-fun-book ideas, but the truth is, what I love to write, where my passion mostly perches all gargoyle-like and sullen, is not particularly popular. And I just don’t care any more. Of course I want –badly– to be published. But not at the price of loving what I do.

    Hard and fast rules can be decent signposts for newbies, IMO, but it’s been a long time since I let them dictate the whats and hows for me, because the truth is, I read a lot, I write a lot, and I have just about as much say in the direction of market as any other peon out there– which is to say, some.

    /affirmation-type-incoherent-rabmle

    [Reply]

  • Nick Says:

    Excellent post. As helpful as it is to check some of the naïveté at the door and understand how the industry works and what the incentives are (especially all the links: the author-agent, agent-editor, editor-publisher, and publisher-market relationships), anyone who devours fiction constantly must certainly have an unsettling intuition that if people wrote to game the market or play by all these “rules”, fiction wouldn’t resemble anything like the books that stand out on the shelves, that hold our attention when we devote them our precious time. (And maybe the large part of published fiction doesn’t. Simple: “That’s not my market and I’m not playing for it.”)

    Sunna: “signposts for newbies” is right. Most of the advice out there consists of quick, conventional fixes for basic compositional missteps. And most of those are better demonstrated at How to Write Badly Well.

    [Reply]

  • sunna Says:

    Holy hell, that site is brilliant. Nick, thanks for the link. :)

    [Reply]

  • Katie Anderson Says:

    Great post! And well said. I am of the “write what you want” camp. I have friends who desperately try to write to the market and even I feel their pressure to get it done fast fast fast!!!!!! (because the trend might change.)

    Your writing is beautiful and compelling - and I’ve only read your blog. You’ll get there - and by there, I mean staring at your book at Barnes and Noble :-)

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply